On Lakoff’s The Political Mind, Looking To Mottahedeh’s The Mantle of the Prophet


The Political Mind by George Lakoff
Perusing the shelves of a bookstore, a year ago I stumbled on George Lakoff’s The Political Mind. Claiming to explain the nature of the American political mind, through the lens of objective, cognitive science, Lakoff’s words seemed a refreshing change from the partisan finger-pointing. So I put the book on my seemingly endless list of things to do, and eventually, I got around to reading it about a month ago.
Having finished the book, in my opinion, if you ever happen to come across the book, go right ahead and skip it. Lakoff’s focus on the inner workings of the mind, from neural patterns, biconceptionalism, and unconscious frames, definitely make for a compelling discussion and newfound introspection about how our minds act in the political realm.
Yet, even as he declares notions of the “left-right” spectrum useless in this discussion, Lakoff’s conclusions seem bent on galvanizing liberals rather than simply informing. Every now and again, you’ll notice a reference to what he clearly views as direct and indirect failings presided over by the Bush administration, with his references to Blackwater and the invasion of Iraq, Enron, healthcare, among other things. Throughout, he calls for a “new enlightenment” that goes beyond mere rationality and utility that pervaded the original enlightenment, to acknowledge the emotional component of our reasoning. In one sense, to any progressive individual, the book is the kind of feel-good literature that makes you feel empowered and a little more certain about how to go about achieving significant progress in the American political landscape.
And, don’t get me wrong: it’s not that I didn’t find myself in agreement with Lakoff, on multiple occasions. I’m definitely sure of my own progressive mindset on countless issues.
Still, Lakoff appears to go through significant pains, at the outset and various other junctions, to convince the reader that he is presenting an entirely objective point of view, while at the same time turning right around and arguing, implicitly or otherwise, that there’s a sort of battle against a conservative mindset that the world must .
Using some of Lakoff’s terminology, one might say that as you move from chapter to chapter, you can’t escape the notion that Lakoff is carefully framing the argument in a manner presenting the progressive point of view as the better option, while failing to acknowledge this frame and the fact that it may in fact be clouding the actual discussion. That really irked me.
In short, I found it a chore to get through Lakoff’s writing. It wasn’t so much dry writing as it was annoyingly hypocritical, and, to the extent that it reached a conclusion, it was so overtly one-sided that it left a bad taste in my mouth for objective, informative writing.
The Mantle of the Prophet Religion and Politics in Iran by Roy Mottahedeh
I came to discover this gem writing on the Iranian revolution on the Council on Foreign Relations’ Foreign Affairs website. I received my copy in the mail today—turns out it’s not all that readily available at most local Barnes and Noble or Borders locations—but having read the opening pages, I’m already excited.
Presented in narrative form, from the reviews I’ve read, Mottahedeh presents an unrivaled account of an increasingly relevant society, and I’m looking forward to coming away with an increased appreciation and understanding for Iran. If nothing else, the perspective is likely to give me a refreshing change from all that the mainstream media love to spew on a daily basis!

















